Politics and Journalism – Journalism and Politics
June 5, 2009
Are we seeing journalism and politics undergoing, what amounts to the same issue – changing models of accountability to their funders ?
Journalism, for the most part, has been funded by the sale of advertising space accompanying the content. As advertisers move their business to the internet, the drop in revenues has brought the newspaper industry to its knees in the US. In other words advertisers are no longer confident that they will benefit from funding journalism.
Is there a parallel in the crisis in UK politics ? The customers (voters) have lost confidence that Parliament will provide the government that they pay for. Putting it in cruelly economic terms – the meta-activity of politics is supported by the real activity of government, just as the meta-activity of journalism is supported by the real activity of advertising. The difference being that there is no current alternative to Parliament, where advertisers can readily jump ship to a ‘better’ ie cheaper solution.
We could argue about cause and effect, since the internet came before the crash in advertising revenues, whereas the crisis of confidence in British politics has gathered pace, arguably, as a result of several exogenous factors. But where journalism is struggling to find a new paradigm, British politicians are still in the throws of a fit of peek at the collapse of their glamour of invulnerability. The endless talk of parliamentary reform over the last few decades has not borne fruit. The scary thing about that is that now that ‘The Crunch’ is upon us, bad ideas hove into view. Parliamentary reform should not be crisis management.
Politics is useful. Journalism is useful. The models of accountability to their respective funders are both changing.
Restructuring Parliament – MPs without portfolio
May 30, 2009
The UK’s political parties are all a-quiver about parliamentary reform so I’m going to suggest MPs without portfolio. We’ve had ministers without portfolio, why not MPs to represent those with little by way of interest in local issues but lots to say on the bigger picture or who have cross-boundary issues.
You’d have a limited number of elected seats that are not geographically tied in order to represent people who live online, those who can’t get to MPs surgeries, those whose problems are not to do with local issues (for example online privacy) and those who generally don’t have much to say on local constituency issues.
If you want reform why not reform along the lines that society is working. My life isn’t limited to a 40 square mile block with 30,000 people. Is yours ?
Update – try as I might I cannot find anyone to suggest this to. No 10 doesn’t have a suggestions box (for obvious reasons), my local MP is a LibDem (so already has an agenda set on this), the parliamentary reform commitee doesn’t even have an e-mail address. How the hell do I actually get the suggestion into the system ? Answers on a post card please.
